You’re right about my use of the word “contract” in the Reality Check and Solutions part

You’re right about my use of the word “contract” in the Reality Check and Solutions part

” The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation. None is better than the three lower degrees of Free Masonry; the public is accustomed to it, expects little from it, and therefore takes little notice of it. Next to this, the form of a learned or literary society is best suited to our purpose, and had Free Masonry not existed, this cover would have been employed; and it may be much more than a cover, it may be a powerful engine in our hands. By establishing reading societies, and subscription libraries, and taking these under our direction, and supplying them through our labours, we may turn the public mind which way we will.” – Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati

Princes and Nations shall disappear from the face of the Earth … and this Revolution shall be the work of Secret Societies.”

Jenny, thanks for the correction. Yes, it was FDR (Franklin D. Roosevelt) not Woodrow Wilson that signed Executive Order 6102 ordering all gold coin, bullion and certificates to be delivered to the Federal Reserve.

It’s nice to hear from someone who knows how important contract law is. I changed it to “biggest scam in history” to go along with the title, in calling it like it is.

Yes he did sign the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 but did nothing in 1933 unless is was secretly FDR

Yes, if this scam is masquerading as a CONTRACT, it is void for all 4 reasons you site. I did write the hub somewhat in the style of a contract, using titles as such, as that’s what the scam seems to purport to be.

Your comments make me think: Could it be that it is constructed as a TRUST, and therefore doesn’t require full disclosure, but does require adherence to the Trust Indenture? Could it be that we are presumed to be Trustees of some trusts, and/or Beneficiaries of others, and/or Grantors of others, and are being chastised for not performing our duties according to the Trust?

I’m not saying that it is one bit legitimate or ethical. I’m just thinking that there might be some twisted way that this abomination is somehow considered to be lawful by its perpetrators. But if they do somehow deem it lawful, it is according to THEIR law, and not either Gods Law or Common Law. They would lose instantly if a jury of common people were to rule based on the true facts.

This would all be very depressing if it weren’t for the abundance and acceleration of public knowledge about this, along with the multitudes of worldwide groups of people organized and dedicated to putting an end to the bankers hold on the people of the earth.

For one thing, a different idea was sold to the people regarding what, precisely, was happening

Perhaps the only distinction I would contribute would be to avoid referring to the New Deal as being a contract.

Fraud voids all contracts from the beginning, and this – although clearly written in the legislation that we had never authorized our representatives to make – was certainly a widespread public fraud. In law, this makes any contract “void for vagueness”. how to get title after paying off car loan in Texas That is, a contract which can have multiple interpretations is void, and the American people were certainly given a different interpretation about it. One which you, as is your civic duty, work to correct.

Vélemény, hozzászólás?